Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Capital Punishment

If you order your research papers from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Capital Punishment. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Capital Punishment paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Capital Punishment, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Capital Punishment paper at affordable prices!


PART 1.


Capital punishment is the severest form of legal punishment today.In this paper, I


intend to state the history of the problem, the two sides of the issue, state possible


solutions, and evaluate those solutions. There are many methods of execution. Procedures


authorized in the United States now are electrocution, the gas chamber, lethal injection,


and the firing squad, which is used only in Utah.The main options for capital punishment,


though, are lethal injection and lethal gas (Snell, 18).Examples of the death penalty


forbidden by law are crucifixion, boiling in oil, drawing and quartering, impalement,


beheading, burning alive, crushing, being torn into bits and pieces, stoning, and drowning.


Hanging, the firing squad, beheading, and stoning are options used in some countries but


are outlawed in the United States.Most of the countries applying these methods are


followers of the traditional practices of Islam.Even the Bible prescribed death as a


penalty for more than 0 crimes.By the end of the 15th century, treason, murder, larceny,


burglary, rape and arson were all grounds for capital punishment.By 1800, over 00


more crimes were acknowledged, increasing the amount of death penalty cases each year


to more than 1000.Interest in abolishing the death penalty didn't become a concern until


the end of the 18th century. The Quakers led a reform in England and America. Several


States abolished capital punishment entirely including Michigan in 1847.Countries such


as Venezuela and Portugal abolished capital punishment in the late 1800's.There are


many statististics involved with the arguement of capital punishment.This year alone,


there has been 567 criminals executed and the total amount of criminals remaining on


death row is ,448 (Murray, 1).Another statistic is that fourteen States required a


minimum age of the death penalty at 18, while sixteen States said capital punishment was


an option between the ages of 14 and 17 (Snell, 18).This brings up the issue of, if the


death penalty is accepted, what should the age limit be? Capital punishment is a topic full


of debate and controversy.The history of the death penalty dates back to 1750 BC and


it's still making history today.


PART .


After looking up capital punishment on the Internet, the majority of information I


found was in opposition to capital punishment.One argument brought up is the cost of


putting someone to death.This year, in Denver, more than .5 million dollars was spent


on the death penalty.The costs include $717,000 on attorneys who defend suspects,


$5,000 was for defense attorneys' private investigators, $51,000 was for expert


witnesses, and $61,000 was for mental health exams (Foster, 1).It is said that it costs


more to enforce capital punishment than it is to put someone in prison for life.Another


argument is if the people on death row are innocent, it would be wrong to put them to


death."One innocent person is freed from death row for every seven who are executed,"


(Murray, 1).Statistics shwo that fifty-eight percent of voters are concerned that an


innocent person might be executed.Death Penalty opponents point to a statistic that


shows eighty-two cases of people who were sentenced to death but were later freed


(Murray, 1).Opposers also feel that there are issues within the death penalty such as


race, wealth, sex, and religion.They believe that the system values white lives more than


black lives, the wealthy more than the poor, and men more than women (Death Penalty


and Sentencing Information, 17).On the topic of religion, they point to the Fifth


Commandment, "Thou shalt not murder." There are many organizations whose goals are


abolishing capital punishment.Among them are People for Abolition Faiths Against the


Death Penalty (PFADP), National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP),


National Petition to End the Death Penalty (NPEDP), and Citizens United for Alternatives


to the Death Penalty (CUADP).These organizations have devoted their time, efforts, and


lives to abolish capital punishment and feel very strongly on the issue.


Advocates of the death penalty feel that executions are the appropriate punishment


for certain criminals committing specific crimes.Public opinion is pro-death penalty


(Foster, 1), but there isn't really a specific group of people who are advocates.


Someone's belief depends mainly on religion, morals, and how one was raised.Advocates


state that with no death penalty and only life without parole, there is no punishment for


criminals sentenced to life if they kill others or escape.The worst that can happen to them


is life in prison, which is what they've already got.Their punishment can't be increased so


they will never be punished for these crimes..% of convicted capital murders argue


for life without parole instead of death.One study showed that criminals, by a 51 ration


believed that capital punishment was a great enough punishment to prevent them from


murdering their victims (Death Penalty and Sentencing Information, 17).Besides


coming up with their own arguments for the death penalty, advocates generally turn


around the oppresses ideas.For example, opponents claim that 8% of the murder


victims in death penalty cases are white while 1% are black (Death Penalty and


Sentencing Information, 17). Advocates wonder why, if capital punishment is racist,


56% of criminals executed are white and only 8% are black. Also, while opposers bring


up the Fifth Commandment as an argument against capital punishment, advocates use


"Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed," (Genesis 6).The


also say that if "no crime deserves the death penalty, then it is hard to see why it was


fitting that Christ be put to death for our sins and crucified among thieves," (Death


Penalty and Sentencing Information, 17).Advocates feel that by executing the


murderers, you prevent them from murdering again.The feel they "must choose the


option that may save innocent lives..."and if "we don't execute murderers, we are


sacrificing innocent lives," (Death Penalty and Sentencing Information, 17).



PART .


There aren't many solutions to capital punishment because if they really were


solutions, capital punishment wouldn't be a problem.CUADP is an organization,


mentioned earlier, that focuses on alternatives to the death penalty.One alternative is that


"persons convicted of capital murder should serve a minimum of 5 years in prison before


the possibility of consideration for parole," (CUADP, 1).Another is that a portion of


the prisoner's earnings while working in prison should go to pay for his/her life in prison.


There are other solutions to capital punishment, such as life in prison, but then the issue of


overcrowding in prison is brought to attention.Another solution is making the cost of


capital punishment so expensive and time consuming that the public won't support it


(Foster, 1).This has already been used in arguments against the death penalty, just as


it was in my paper.A solution to lower the number of death penalty cases, but not


completely abolish it, is a three-judge panel.A three-judge panel is a panel of three judges


that replace the jury.Legislature in Denver, Colorado created this system after July 1,


15 (Foster, 1). Advocates of the death penalty don't have a solution to the death


penalty because it is their solution.They feel that if all murderers would instantly die after


murdering, they would kill only if they wished to die themselves.



PART 4.


In this section I intend to evaluate a few of the solutions to capital punishment


from above.The issue of life without parole can be argued by cost.Right now, it is said


that capital punishment is more expensive (at least million dollars) than life without


parole (1 million dollars for up to fifty years).Although, it is estimated by advocates that


it will cost $1. million - $.6 million more than equivalent death penalty cases (Death


Penalty and Sentencing Information, 17).Life in prison also makes overcrowding an


issue, like I mentioned earlier.Every year, the prisons get more and more crowded.The


three-judge panel system has its flaws too."There has been four to five times more death


penalty cases since the three-judge panel has come into being," (Foster, 1) This could


be good or bad depending on your viewpoint of capital punishment.The three-judge


panel also increases the cost of the cases.A solution that I came up with was to allow the


victim's families to decide whether or not the death penalty should be an option.After


evaluating this, I decided that it would be wrong because most of the families would just


be looking for anyone to be punished for the crime as long as it was someone.Being


distraught, they might overlook any evidence pointing to innocence.I feel that if all


evidence shows that the convicted person is the murderer with 100% certainty, capital


punishment should be enforced.If there are any doubts at all, it should be life without


parole or a very long sentence.As said earlier, capital punishment is full of debate and


controversy.It will probably never be made completely legal or be completely abolished


because it depends on morals and opinions.Please note that this sample paper on Capital Punishment is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Capital Punishment, we are here to assist you.Your research papers on Capital Punishment will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!