If you order your research papers from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Conscription Dividing Australia WW1. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Conscription Dividing Australia WW1 paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Conscription Dividing Australia WW1, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Conscription Dividing Australia WW1 paper at affordable prices!
After the three years of bloody conflict the ready supply of troops to the Front was drying up.Australia was faced with a problem how to maintain the numbers necessary to support Britain in the war.Volunteers became scarce.Australia had to decide whether people should be forced to fight.And so the Conscription Debate began.Conscription is defined as compulsory enrolment, especially for the armed forces. The process was quite simple, resembling that of a lottery.A birth date was chosen and men of a certain age, with that birth date were conscripted.
There were many arguments both for and against this motion and much debate on the issue.It was believed widely that conscription was a successful way of approaching the lack of troops to ally Britain in the Gallipoli campaign.The basis of this argument was that conscripting men to the armed force would theoretically contribute to a quicker peace among nations and a glorious victory.Some supposed that the British Empire would have an opportunity to return the favour in future, therefore securing an ally for Australia in later times.It was widely known that Australia had a spiritual connection with Britain, since and prior to federating.Therefore, it was considered a duty that men of Australia should assist the 'mother' country, and of course, their own nation.Prime Minister Billy Hughes considered the war as a 'fight to the death', with the 'future of Australian democracy relying on allied victory'.
While it seemed to many that conscripting was the only option, some arguments contradicted the 'duty' to fight and the various political figures who stood by this.The chief factor in the anti-conscription argument was that conscription was considered a breach of freedom.The troops would be ripped of the right to make their own decision, and forced to partake in war.This could be against a man's beliefs, religion or purely his will.And it was a question, was it worth it? It would not only be destroying one man, but possibly a family, or friends.
An Anti-Conscription League was formed and the Womens Peace Army, a movement led by Vida Goldstein, mounted a fierce crusade against the war and conscription in particular.The Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne, Daniel Mannix, was also passionate in opposing conscription and war.He spoke to an audience at the Exhibition Hall in Melbourne, in November 117, urging the community to vote against conscription in the referendum....What right have we to sign the death sentence of our fellow citizens on December 0th? But if the question of life or death is to be put, then only eligibles should be permitted to vote. If men think it their duty to go to the front, and go, we can admire and praise their self-sacrifice. But how can women, shielded by their sex, send unwilling young Australians to the front, and to their death? How can men who are unfit for service, and never were fit, send other men to their doom? ....
Another movement of the time against conscription was a group called 'Save The Sons', driven by mothers with children who could have been victims of conscription in Australia.These are all examples of the elements of the community opposed to conscription.
In summary, conscription in World War One, in Australia, did indeed divide the nation.Certain people made their views public, some very contradictive to the mainstream view.And although various politicians agreed to the movement, there were still individuals adopting the radical view on the issue.Pacifists and other citizens made their point that they disagreed with such a policy.And so, on a political note, the nation was separated, for a period, into where they stood on the issue.
I consider conscription a very controversial subject.I strongly disagree with it as it is, in my opinion, a simple infringement on every person's right to liberty.And I am supposing that a once radical view on war and conscripting to armed forces, is now an opinion of many.
Please note that this sample paper on Conscription Dividing Australia WW1 is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Conscription Dividing Australia WW1, we are here to assist you.Your research papers on Conscription Dividing Australia WW1 will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
